What are more fun or better in UW? - Guild Wars Forums

sid00 · Mar 02, 2006, 10:58 PM // 22:58

I have been trying to decide on a build for UW. I can't decide weather to go with as a monk primary or necromance as the primary. Can you guys help ease my decision. The search engine doesn't work

RaabTheGuru · Mar 03, 2006, 12:12 AM // 00:12

I've gone as both. To me, necromancer primary is much harder but more fun in my opinion. Monk primary can be fun also, but either way, both will become less appealing over time.

Kinroan · Mar 03, 2006, 01:43 AM // 01:43

Well...let me tell you from my experience, I think a necro is many many times funner to play, but unless you're SS or MM, its almost impossible to find a group near the end...and as some1 who has fun with Blood, it gets a bit annoying. While on the other side, a monk, in my humble opinion, is boring, but there's always a market for monks in any mission.

koneko · Mar 03, 2006, 02:01 AM // 02:01

Monk: easy to find a group; harder (constant attention to the party), less fun (OMG OMG OMG REZ REZ REZ REZ REZ HEZALZ0R NOW U NOOB)
Necromancer: hard(er) to find a group; commonly delegated as the "support" character in groups (Monk: My Energy is 0 of 52 My Energy is 0 of 52 My Energy is 0 of 52 BIP BIP BIP NOW); a little bit more fun (?)

Mar 02, 2006, 10:58 PM // 22:58	#1
sid00 Ascalonian Squire Join Date: Jan 2006 Guild: Caliber-Inc Profession: W/Mo	What are more fun or better in UW? I have been trying to decide on a build for UW. I can't decide weather to go with as a monk primary or necromance as the primary. Can you guys help ease my decision. The search engine doesn't work

Mar 03, 2006, 12:12 AM // 00:12	#2
RaabTheGuru Frost Gate Guardian Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Southern California Guild: Wizards Anomyous [WoA] Profession: N/Me	I've gone as both. To me, necromancer primary is much harder but more fun in my opinion. Monk primary can be fun also, but either way, both will become less appealing over time.

Mar 03, 2006, 01:43 AM // 01:43	#3
Kinroan Academy Page Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Newport, NC USA Guild: ANT Profession: N/Me	Well...let me tell you from my experience, I think a necro is many many times funner to play, but unless you're SS or MM, its almost impossible to find a group near the end...and as some1 who has fun with Blood, it gets a bit annoying. While on the other side, a monk, in my humble opinion, is boring, but there's always a market for monks in any mission.

Mar 03, 2006, 02:01 AM // 02:01	#4
koneko Site Contributor Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: 38??16′ N 140??52′ E Profession: Mo/Me	Monk: easy to find a group; harder (constant attention to the party), less fun (OMG OMG OMG REZ REZ REZ REZ REZ HEZALZ0R NOW U NOOB) Necromancer: hard(er) to find a group; commonly delegated as the "support" character in groups (Monk: My Energy is 0 of 52 My Energy is 0 of 52 My Energy is 0 of 52 BIP BIP BIP NOW); a little bit more fun (?)